Yeah, I don't mean to go on and on (but maybe I do just by saying that), but it isn't just instructions. It is written in a very distinct voice and style that isn't just a "here's how to make a cake" instructions. I'm not saying that you deliberately passed someone else's work off as your own, but in a sense you did. Think about if someone used one of your posts that you worked hours on and posted it as his or her own, with a few minor adjustments. Then claimed credit for the information being widely disseminated.
You're not the only one who should have cited the Stranger article. All I'm saying is this would have got you kicked out of university (or heavily censured) for cheating. I know, I know, this isn't school, but intellectual property is intellectual property. Over and out.
Re: Sources
Date: 2006-08-30 04:51 am (UTC)You're not the only one who should have cited the Stranger article. All I'm saying is this would have got you kicked out of university (or heavily censured) for cheating. I know, I know, this isn't school, but intellectual property is intellectual property. Over and out.