foxtongue: (see the sky)
foxtongue ([personal profile] foxtongue) wrote2007-07-19 06:37 pm

I can't believe you watched that twice

Went to see Transformers at the Drive-in last night with Ray. (Damn that Michael Bay.) It rained a splash, but it worked out well for us.

We could shout at the screen all we wanted and not bother anyone.

[identity profile] kindelingboy.livejournal.com 2007-07-20 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
All throughout my childhood I played with robots that could turn into dragons, rocks, dinosaurs, cars, trucks, whatever. All that time I imagined what it would be like if they were real. I tried to envision massive robots destroying cities and turning each other into scrap.

Not only did I get to see that, but I got to see it with a horribly awkward teenager, directed by a man who understood that there was no way on this Earth that you could make a movie about giant, transforming robots and NOT have it be absolutely ridiculous.

It was so over the top that I thought it worked.

Unlike Spider-Man 3.

[identity profile] porphyre.livejournal.com 2007-07-20 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
Which I don't even have the remotest most obscure reason to see whatsoever. unlike Transformers, which I went to purely out of romance.

[identity profile] inri33.livejournal.com 2007-07-20 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
Don't. Spiderman 3 is balls.

[identity profile] thevintagestar.livejournal.com 2007-07-20 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
An that is being really kind to the movie.

Or really harsh on balls.

[identity profile] donnaidh-sidhe.livejournal.com 2007-07-20 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
I vote for the former.